| Nickel van Duijvenboden | Announcements | Aleksander (2010) | Panopticon (2010) | Latecomers (2009) | Looking at Thinking (2009) | Plateau (2008) | Reservoir (2008) | Hohenau (2008) | Wild Viewing Screen (2008) | Metamorphosis (2007) | Ramble (2006) | Howard (2006) | Strings (2003) | The Grand Absence (2003) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Download
two new texts in Documents 31.05 Spoken column on the pros (and cons) of a PhD programme for artists, Faculty of Arts, VU Amsterdam 06.05 Lecture and artist talk in Hamburger Kunsthalle on the occasion of Geert Goiris’ opening 27.03 Opening Sideways in Museum voor Moderne Kunst Arnhem 27.03 Short fiction ‘Panopticon’ published in Sideways: Reflections on Changing Contexts in Art About my work Writing and image-making are never far apart in my work. From the start it has been placed within several contexts: photography, visual art, literature, criticism, theory. For a while I thought I had to resolve this ambiguity, until I realised that it was a condition to arrive at my work. — January 2010 Also read the interview. |
Imagine a group of uniformed men: soldiers,
high-ranking officers, physicists, and journalists.
They’re huddled together in a dusty trench dug just for the occasion—the
excavator is still there, casting a shadow over them. Before
their eyes, the desert stretches on for miles, the view uninterrupted
except for a distant mountain range. There is nothing to see.
Silence. A warm breeze drifts over their heads, making them all
equal.
A siren wails across the level sands from various directions. There is no way of telling where the source of the sound could be. – One minute, someone says. People start pushing and shoving. – Stay down. – But I’m sticking out. – You’ll be fine. It won’t come to that. – How could you possibly know? The last one pushes at the others again. They settle into a mass. – Do you have children? he asks me. I nod. – What are we doing here, in God’s name? – Shut your trap, another man says. The silence lasts for seconds. Instinctively, the men bow their heads. I can feel the boy behind me laying his on my back. I can’t be sure I’m not imagining it, but even with my forehead pressed against the sandy wall of the trench and my eyes squeezed shut, I see a flash of light. Suddenly a shock wave travels through the ground, rippling the desert floor like a sheet. Then a low roar comes crashing over us, pressing us down, as if bulldozers were rolling over the trench. Without raising my head over the edge, I open my eyes. Sand and dust fall onto my neck. I can’t see a thing, not even the wall of the trench, my fingers digging into the dry soil. The sand gets into everything—my nostrils, my ears, the collar and sleeves of my jacket. When all I can hear is the whisper of shifting dust, I finally dare to raise my head a little. I can feel a warm wind, warmer than the desert air. – It’s coming this way, the man next to me shouts. There’ll be nothing left of us. |
We were in a cab with Parisa heading north,
towards Navid’s place to record a second take. Through the open windows of
the car I saw the Tehrani high-rises passing by on both sides of the Kordestan
Expressway. The engine produced a high-pitched noise. It barely managed going
uphill. The air flowing in smelled metallic; it stuck to the back of my throat
like a cake of lead. The mountains to the north were veiled by an ashen sky.
We took an exit near the park and queued up behind the perpetual traffic
jam on Valiasr Avenue. The cab driver bent over to his radio and tuned to
a programme with modern Iranian pop music.
“It won’t be long,” Parisa said apologetically. Turning in her seat, she accidentally unclipped her seatbelt. She pushed it aside airily. “They never work anyway.” “Is this an expensive neighbourhood?” I asked. She nodded. “Cleaner air.” “Where does your circle of friends live?” “Scattered around Tehran. Most of them live with their parents, in the suburbs.” “The good parts.” She shrugged. “What’s the difference if you cannot leave?” We took a turn into a narrow side street and stopped in front of a fence. I could look under the apartment building. The entrance looked well maintained. There were parked cars maybe two generations younger than the dented working horse that had carried us all the way up from the city centre. We were let in by a buzzer and took the elevator to the top floor. Navid’s room, an attic perched on a flat roof, was directly above his parent’s home. The access door to the roof was open. There was a faint smell of marijuana. Navid welcomed us rather phlegmatically, but the willingness with which he set up his audio equipment conveyed a concealed joy. |
“We’ve left the bicycles behind on the road and are now
continuing on foot,” I heard Stefan say behind me. As always, the realization
that he was filming suddenly changed everything.
“Nickel, why are we walking through these woods?” “To see where this path leads.” “What are you hoping to find?” “Hoping to find? I have no idea. The remains of a penal colony, I guess.” “Aren’t you scared?” “Scared? Of what?” “Bodies.” I knew what had given him that idea. A couple of days before, I had read him a passage about a mass grave. It described corpses sliding down a mountainside after an overfilled grave had burst open. The permafrost had kept the bodies perfectly intact. “Or did they get rid of all that?” he asked. “I don’t think so.” He stopped and pointed his camera at the cart track, which at this point was almost entirely overgrown. He was unaware of his shoe sinking into the muddy ground. “Are you hoping somewhere inside that we find a mass grave at the end of this path?” “Somewhere inside? What’s that supposed to mean? Deep down in my heart? Jesus.” I started walking again. “You don’t really want to go that far, do you?” he shouted. I shook my head. “We passed that point a long time ago. Whatever we find now, we’ll just have to accept it. We can’t hit rewind any more. If you’re so keen on making a documentary, why don’t you just interview yourself?” He was silent. “You know why we’re here. Everything we’ve done has been leading up to this. We want to get an impression of what it was like by standing in the place where it happened. We’re not tourists. We’re trying to rouse something that lies slumbering beneath this landscape. Otherwise you could just as well make some garden-variety travel film, and it would never occur to us that the road we just cycled on might contain the crushed bones of forced labourers.” Behind me I heard the camera snap shut. “You’re just afraid of feeling empty. You always have been.” |
Your work gives the impression that I could just
walk in here
and, without further ado, start asking you profound questions. JCJ Vanderheyden is clearly amused, but immediately tries to lower my expectations. “I wish that were true. I guess we can give it a try.” On the train I was reading your ‘statements’, which are philosophical in character. Does art bear any relation to philosophy? “Art can be a type of philosophizing. Art and philosophy are both ways of knowing. I see them as parallel to one another; neither one is subordinate to the other — at least, as long as we’re not talking about forms of history, or art history. It doesn’t have much to do with those.” When I read philosophy, I often feel an urge to set it aside as soon as it strikes a chord. Not out of impatience, but because I’m already trying to move on to the next step. A good sentence has that effect, makes you want to start working. “That sounds logical to me. It’s because the activity of making art can be another way of philosophizing. Personally, I do things before I think them. That’s a different way of arriving at insights. Written philosophy doesn’t do anything for me. I know a few philosophers, and it’s funny how often I end up saying, “I already knew that.” But really, it’s not so strange. It must happen to lots of artists, or at least to certain kinds of artists. Beyond that, it’s hard to compare philosophy to visual art, because philosophy is a form of writing, a form of words.” I’ve always seen images as vehicles of verbal communication. But you once wrote, “The image is capable of that which words and language cannot name.” “I still think that’s true. It seems to me that language can’t furnish analogies to images. Likewise, my paintings can’t be described in words; there’s absolutely no point in trying. When people write and talk about art, they’re often trying to justify its form, but good art is its own justification.” |
Without saying anything, he handed her the lens,
a heavy lump of glass that protruded through the lens board like an hourglass.
She clamped it in the holder, expanded the bellows enough to have the lens
project an image onto the focusing screen, and finally opened the shutter.
“And now?” she said, as she lowered her hands. “Focus.” She pulled the black cloth over her head and rested the lead-weighted hem in a fold of the bellows. “Well?” he inquired. “Shapes in a mist.” He chuckled silently. “That is unavoidable today.” “So, a sharp mist,” she understood. As she pressed the loupe against the focusing screen, her breathing created vapour on the ground glass. She fumbled vainly with her right arm for the wheel at the end of the focusing stage. “Here,” he said as he guided her hand. “Use the pieces of ice on the ground.” As she moved the lens inwards with the wheel, the frozen ground appeared upside down at the top of the image. She focused on an almost imperceptible dark form, a curve that loomed up out of the whiteness. It pierced the fog like the bow of a ship in a miniature world. “What was it again, one stop overexposure?” “At least. You only have whites, you have to compensate.” He handed her the light meter. A ribbed white slide was positioned in front of the selenium sensors to temper the incidence of light. She pointed the meter towards the landscape in front of her, pressed the switch on the side of the apparatus and took a reading. He nodded as he took the light meter and replaced it in his jacket pocket. She adjusted the aperture, attached the cable release, closed the shutter and pulled the lever to cock it. She then stood behind the camera, took the black metal cassette from him and clamped it under the focusing screen. She pulled the slide sideways so that the film in the camera was uncovered and raised her hand with the cable release clasped in her fingers. This is how she envisaged herself and Lev, viewed from behind, standing in front of the white landscape, motionless, her hand raised. She peered over the camera at the Arctic Ocean hidden from view and listened to their breathing. Then she pressed the shutter release. |
Hauser felt as if he were being strangled. The scene moved
him, though he could not have said exactly why. Meanwhile, the screenwriter
had come over to him. “This was an incredibly difficult bit to write,” he said in a low voice. Hauser avoided his eyes. “Was it?” “I get distracted,” the screenwriter continued. “Happens every time. I watch movies, sort my photos, listen to music, read the paper—it’s a nightmare.” Hauser nodded. He had no idea what the screenwriter was talking about. “It’s because of the high expectations. It has to be memorable. A new image. Nothing less. But when I’m under pressure, I always take the path of least resistance. A scene like this, for example, I can write out of the corner of my eye, in just a few seconds, between one thing and another, making coffee and watching TV. It has nothing to do with concentration any more. It’s pure fragmentation.” “Fragmentation,” Hauser repeated. “Yes. As a mode. Instead of concentration. We don’t need to pause for breath anymore as we process all the images coming at us. Those days are behind us. The transition from one thing to another is seamless.” The director looked distractedly over his shoulder at the screenwriter, who broke off his monologue. In the silence that followed, Hauser returned his attention to the actors. The man was still lying on the floor, while the boy was walking away, into the depths of the warehouse. The image of the child making his way alone stirred something inside him that he couldn’t suppress simply by swallowing. It was shattering. “Okay, stop,” the director said suddenly. “Let’s pack it in.” As the entire crew slowly set to work, he rushed ahead of them to the door, fishing his sunglasses out of his pocket and flipping them open. “Thanks,” he mumbled as he went by. “That was...” Hauser began, hurrying after him, “That was...” “That was a one-time deal,” he replied brusquely. “I’m scrapping that scene. I had to see it to be sure I could get rid of it.” |
The sound of my footsteps alters as I step on the grit
of the parking space behind the low church of Hohenau. It is a fine type
of grit, ivory-coloured, like ground bones. The dust soils my shoes.
I stand still, a couple of metres from the car, Jacq’s dilapidated flesh-coloured
504. I need a moment to convince myself that it really is his car. As
I walk to the front of the car, I immediately recognise the double headlights,
the surly grille where the metal Peugeot emblem is missing. I needlessly
look through the car window and see my own crumpled Kodak packaging sticking
out of the ashtray. Dazed, I walk over the grass and flop down at a picnic table in the shade under the trees. The confirmation that Jacq is here, at the moment when I had stopped believing in it, has knocked the wind out of me. For the first time I become aware that I have been following him like a detective, that I am sticking my nose into his affairs. What am I doing here? Clearly no one is in need of my ominous tourism. Do I wish to confront him? Now that I have come across his tracks, I can no longer pretend to myself that I just wanted to know what he is up to. No, I want him to account for himself. Why has he left me alone, what was so important, and what merits so much secrecy? In the meantime I pick at the shapes carved in the table-top. Squares have been carved in various places with a sharp object, divided into four smaller squares. The figure strikes me as a remnant of a repentant vandal: from my youth I remember that this is the quickest way of erasing a swastika. Joining up the arms so that you are left with just a square comprised of four smaller squares. How often have I had to do this, confronted with the vague sense of shame that remained after I had defiled a school desk or a toilet with the square icon? The figure never failed to shock me, even though I drew the offensive interplay of angular lines in a spirit of wantonness. To me it was a symbol of the unspeakable; not erasing it would have been a grave error. But the sensation of the transgression and then subsequently correcting myself, brought me close enough to the limit to taste what it was like to be evil. |
He passed the last house and halted. Built some years
ago, it had never been inhabited. Peering through the mesh fencing and
the reflecting glass, he caught a glimpse of its interior. It was sparse,
elementary, a minimum. Table at the window, two armchairs by the fireplace.
No curtains or lights. A framed portrait hung above the chimney breast. Even without a proper view he was able to recognize it: the frontal one, with the uniform. He had it too, at home. Everybody did. He pictured the dust on the frame, on the furniture, on the floor. The smell inside the house. He pictured the man for whom it was built, but who had never been there. On the terrace were four garden chairs resting against a table on their front legs. A masoned windbreak. A stained gas tank. A small pool with a concrete edge, empty. The lawn between the terrace and the empty swimming pool had been trimmed no so long ago. They kept it, for the absent one. But that did not exceed the lawn. The molehills were merely leveled. A sublime metaphore for the nation: a superficial order that was being eaten away from within. As he quietly made his way through the thicket, the framed portrait stuck in his mind, as if it kept staring at him. That one sole image, he thought, in an endless reproduction, should illustrate an absolute ban on all images. |
It all begins with the removal from a cooled storehouse.
A dramatic reheating ensues. The temperature rises with about ten
degrees, but remains chilly all the same. Here you spend the night. The
following morning, the same person transports you once again, but this
time to a warmer spot at room temperature. You end up on a table, where
you are subjected to a superficial examination under glaring lamplight.
Possible damage is recorded and inventoried. Gloved fingers are set to
work. Before you even realize, a scalpel pries you open. Organic tissue
is removed, disappearing without further ado into a waste basket. You
end up naked on a white surface that after a moment’s flicker lights
up into a glaring white. Everything tightens inside. This must be what
pain at a molecular level feels like.
It’s been years since you were exposed to so much light. It reminds you of that very first time, when you were still blank and greeted by a joyful scene. Then too, it happened with an unexpected flash searing a drawing of light onto your dark support. That’s what started it all, fifty-three years ago. Almost right after that, you were submerged into some foul fluid, in pitch-dark, time and time again. It bit into you, it made you swell up. Then, for the first time, you were exposed to the light of a lamp for a prolonged period of time. They cut you up into equal pieces and clasped you into a rectangular housing, so people could take in your fixed impression through a small window preventing them from soiling you with their sweaty fingers. Strangely enough, the doctor is wearing cotton gloves this time. Together with others, you are subjected to a slow procedure scanning you from both sides in a light box. Nothing escapes scrutiny. Your inside is exposed, fragmented and reconstructed elsewhere. It seems you are being discarded. Afterwards you are brought back to your original state, with your wafer-thin essence joined without stitches to the frame where they lifted you from. You feel mangled – yes, that’s exactly the phrase: to mangle. What sort of laboratory is this anyway? |
There are places where no borders, demarcations, dividing
lines exist. Just gradual transitions, grey areas dotted with debris.
I guess it depends how you approach it. If you were to zoom out to the
proverbial Great Wall distance, you would either see no border at all,
or a distinct line, cutting through land with great precision, but showing
no marks on the surface. You might not be able to distinguish a fault line while standing on one. Other places, however, might retain obvious transitory features, forming a mental vacuum, invisibly charged, brimming with history, its existence unregistered by the senses or other, more objective means. Out there, nature slowly covers up remnants, both destroying and retaining. But not here. Here, I am one of Ramble, not covered up but covered, monitored. Every patch of land was pre-planned, before our arrival. This place should have been a carbon copy of our original habitat, but it is merely the embodiment of an architect’s lack of imagination. Or maybe it is an abstraction of the idea of a habitat where, due to spacial and economic limits, each requisite ingredient is sparsely represented. The architect’s explanation would be that the whole thing is so delicately balanced; to minimize the parameters is to maximize control. And so each element – down to the tiniest grain – balances out the other. |
The voice came from his left. “Yes,” said the young man eagerly, when he was acknowledged. “I was wondering – after this lecture in which, if I may be so free, you criticise everything – whether there is anything, any artists, works, books, that you do admire?” This for Howard was the most difficult question conceivable. He was on his own here and adopted an innocent grin. Why hadn’t he prepared for this? His audience suddenly regarded him with sincere interest and some even held their pens at the ready. He experienced that strange sensation again: here he was the cynic who excelled in inflammatory speeches always directed against something, who could only discuss such matters in a negative light, and yet his audience appeared so interested in his taste. As if someone who could express his aversion to things so perfectly, would also be able to talk about what he loved so infectiously. He himself doubted whether he loved anything at all. Because his silence had began to exceed the limits of the customary pause for thought, the young man sat up straight in his chair as if giving weight to what, after all, had been a perfectly legitimate question. “Because, if you yourself create a work, I mean, you are a visual artist aren’t you? - then it must be difficult - to my way of thinking - not having a positive force to motivate you. Something to enthuse about.” Howard tapped the edge of the lectern with the stick, the stick containing the rolled-up images which, according to him, were indeed nothing less than ashes... |
We find ourselves in a city we cannot leave, yet we are
not aware of this. The city has been built with great care, so that you
unconsciously move in circles. At the city edge there are strings of
houses or bushes, not very different from the ones in other streets,
that press you back into the city centre, with a naturalness that is
inclined to make you believe that after the final street there will be
countless others.
If you desire, you may enter some of the houses. The space to move around extends as far as several storeys. You will not discover sanitation. Some houses don’t even possess a front door. You can only view these from the outside, but the absence of an entrance can’t keep you from imagining the interior. Somewhere in the city you own a garage where you can store fancy cars and motorbikes. One way or another, it is never very difficult to rediscover the accessible houses or the garage. If you wait long enough, you’ll come across it again as a matter of course. You are, it seems, fated to discover important and pleasant spots, for they are located along exactly the route that is an obvious part of an ever more familiar circumference. The various neighbourhoods have each got a certain identity. There are palm trees in the streets, lampposts, traffic lights. Waiting for these to turn green would however be absurd. In this respect, it’s a cardboard world: details appear to make sense, but don’t. At times, we see each other driving among the rest of the traffic. We are not allowed to adopt a speed slower than the maximum and do not at all feel the need to.We are in this city to kill each other. The opportunities to harm one another are limitless. Here, death is painless, instantly followed by a flash of light at your character’s spawnpoint, a flash which implies your reincarnation. |
The day after my graduate show opened, my father rang
me up from abroad. He asked what the opening had been like and how the
exhibition was going.
“It’s a shame you can’t be here”, was the first thing I said. “I am trying to visualize it from here. I was hoping you’d be able to feed me a few details”, he said cheerfully. To visualize something. I was instantly reminded of his last article, which was coincidentally about this same subject. My father contended that “to visualize something” actually means to place yourself in the role that you would have had in the situation you are trying to visualize; not just a simple, cerebral visualization or projection, but an actual “being present” or role play, acting if you will, with the only limitation that you cannot be physically present. With age comes the skill to keep this to oneself; the subtle act of inner visualization. I didn’t dare to tell my father that this conversation, during which he was making a visualization of my situation, was a perfect opportunity to test out his assertion. Was he really acting as if he was with me, inside himself? After we had spoken, would he no longer have the need to come? If he only knew how much his presence would have meant to me, whether it was mental or physical. |
| Nickel van Duijvenboden | Biography | Aleksander (2010) | Panopticon (2010) | Latecomers (2009) | Looking at Thinking (2009) | Plateau (2008) | Reservoir (2008) | Hohenau (2008) | Wild Viewing Screen (2008) | Metamorphosis (2007) | Ramble (2006) | Howard (2006) | Strings (2003) | The Grand Absence (2003) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
The work of Nickel van
Duijvenboden (Amsterdam, 1981)
is positioned in between writing and visual art.
His 2003 debut, The Grand Absence, was a first attempt to replace images with language. From then on he experimented with writing methods that verge on visual arts, such as text-based artworks, monologues, sound installations, letters and lectures. Perception and the imagination have been leitmotifs throughout his work. The 2008 novella Plateau is a reflection on human and mechanical perception. Nickel started Il faut with Gwenneth Boelens in 2006, issuing combinations of text and images. Besides working autonomously, he writes in commission and teaches at the Photo Department of the Gerrit Rietveld Academy in Amsterdam. Download CV (doc) |
Aleksander is a middle-aged man when he decides
to re-read his father’s letters from the 1950s. He has always been
sceptical about them. Not only because they contain unimaginable
stories, but also because his father left him behind when he embarked
on his adventurous journeys, and chose to publish the letters
in a novel before Aleksander could even read. ‘Aleksander’ is the provisional title for a short fiction, currently being written as part of a long-term collaboration with the Belgian artist Geert Goiris. A substantial book is planned to appear in 2011 and will comprise photographs by Geert and a text by me. Geert Goiris travelled to Antarctica twice for his project Whiteout: The Unreliable Narrator. Along with his other work, the images from this journey form an estranging oeuvre in which bizarre natural phenomena and objects play an important role. After reading Plateau (2008), Geert decided to give me carte blanche for a story in his book. ‘Aleksander’ can be seen as a prologue to the final text. It was released on the occasion of a reading in the Hamburger Kunsthalle and a publication of CAB Burgos. Download the full text in Documents |
The short story Panopticon, A Fictionalised
Travelogue was conceived as a contribution to the group project Sideways,
which evolved around the topic of being displaced as an artist.
Part of the group process was creating an exhibition in
Tehran. The impression this process made on me is expressed in Panopticon, a partly fictional travel journal. The duality of a feeling of belonging versus a sensation of displacement is present all the time in situations where my vantage points, language and photography, come into play. Another motif is the paradoxical sensation of meeting and collaborating with Iranians of the same age as myself: the more I understood of the political deadlock they dealt with in making art, the more liberating it was for me to be there and work with them. Panopticon was printed in the sizeable book Sideways: Reflections on Changing Contexts in Art. Its publication coincided with a group exhibition in the Museum voor Moderne Kunst in Arnhem, the Netherlands. The small catalogue Sideways in Tehran is a remainder of the activities in Iran. Sideways:
Reflections on Changing Contexts in ArtAtousa Bandeh Ghiasabadi, Sara Blokland, Nickel van Duijvenboden, Bassam Chekhes, Katrin Korfmann, Tina Rahimy Fonds BKVB, 2010 ISBN 978-90-76936-24-6 English 22 x 28,5 cm / 148 p. + 32 p. / paperback with additional stitched-in reader €29,95 Order by sending me an e-mail Sideways
in TehranAtousa Bandeh Ghiasabadi, Amirali Ghasemi (ed.) Self-issued, 2008 Persian and English 14,5 x 21 cm / 24 p. / stapled €2,- Order by sending me an e-mail |
In the short story ‘Latecomers’ two brothers
make a bicycle trek through a not explicitly named “guilty landscape”
– a term coined by Dutch painter Armando to designate sites that
once harboured atrocities. While searching for remnants, the two
brothers are confronted with the obscure beauty and desolation of
the landscape. The question what has driven them to go there becomes
the subject of a fraternal conversation. This story originated from two biking trips I made with my brother along the former Iron Curtain in central Germany. An important motive was to study the way our experience of nature is distorted by historical knowledge. Another theme is the problematic relation of the generation of the 70s and 80s with such unimaginable events as the Holocaust and the stalinistic labour camps. How can these issues maintain their urgency to younger generations? Does our involvement with history consist of more than a lust for the spectacular? ‘Latecomers’ was written for Lunar Distance, a curatorial programme by Suzanne Wallinga involving an exhibition and a book for De Hallen Haarlem. The project studied the role of images in relation to epistemological questions like “What can we know?” Next to this text, the book includes essays by Arie Altena and Mariska Kriek. Lunar
DistanceSuzanne Wallinga (ed.) De Hallen Haarlem, 2009 ISBN 978-94-90198-02-2 Dutch and English 17 x 24 cm / 80 p. / paperback €15,- Order here |
‘Looking at Thinking’ is an interview with Dutch
artist JCJ Vanderheyden. Having reached the age of eighty, Vanderheyden
is renowned for his abstract painting, installations and photography.
From the sixties his work has developed in multiple cycles, only
to return to variations of his earliest work. Perception is a recurring
theme in his work, with an important role for coincidence and experiment.
Roger Willems of Roma Publications asked me to do the interview on the occasion of the publication of a definitive catalogue on JCJ's work called The Analogy of the Eye, in February 2009. JCJ
Vanderheyden: The Analogy of the EyeRoger Willems (ed.) Roma Publications, 2009 ISBN 978-90-77459-31-7 English, Dutch and Portuguese 21 x 26 cm / 264 p. / paperback €40 Order here |
A short fiction set in the Cold War era, Plateau features
two scientists stationed on the Arctic drift ice for a year. The question how
they should relate to the landscape forms the heart of a discussion which seems
to be driving them apart. The idea to write Plateau arose in 2007, while I was flipping through a 1968 Encyclopaedia Brittanica. I realised that the vast amount of knowledge required to fill all 25 volumes, had by now become obsolete – but that didn’t make it less inspiring. The old black and white illustrations, together with lemmas on polar explorations, satellites and cartography, conjured up the ideal backdrop for a close encounter between art and science. This encounter is personified by two characters: the thoughtful climatologist Ute, always striving for pure objectivity; and the nonchalant Lev, whose attitude towards science is characterised by irony. In spite of this difference, they have to acccept that they are subject to the same conditions: nature, the senses, and each other. Plateau was published in December 2008 by Roma Publications. It was designed by Roger Willems, edited by Arnoud Holleman and Cathelijne Hoorn, and illustrated by Gwenneth Boelens. It is my second book, following the 2003 collection of essays The Grand Absence. PlateauNickel van Duijvenboden Roma Publications, 2008 ISBN 978-90-77459-33-1 Dutch and English 14 x 20,5 cm / 2 x 48 p. / paperback €13,50 Order here |
The short story ‘Reservoir’ was written
for the text book
Questioning History: Imagining the Past in Contemporary Art. In
response to Frank van der Stok’s statement that the images that surround
us offer a very limited view on history, 18 authors wrote a contribution,
among whom Peter Delpeut, Jan Verwoert and Val Williams. ‘Reservoir’ is one of the few fiction texts in the book. It has a motto by Werner Herzog: “I have the impression that the images that surround us today are worn out; they are abused and useless and exhausted. [...] The lack of adequate imagery is a danger. It is as serious a defect as being without memory. [...] If we do not develop adequate images we will die out like dinosaurs.” The perception of the main character serves as an evocation of this notion. Through his eyes every occurrence seems like an absolute novelty. In a nondescript landscape, he is the caretaker of two warehouses: one seemingly empty, the other seemingly occupied. Questioning
History: Imagining the Past in Contemporary ArtFrank van der Stok (ed.) NAi Publishers, 2008 ISBN 978-90-5662-659-4 English 14.5 x 22.8 cm / 180 p. / paperback €23,50 Order here |
Hohenau is the name of a village founded by German
colonists in Paraguay. This village plays an important
role in the short fiction Wytske van Keulen asked me
to write for her photo book We would come to doubt
everything. And almost everyone would come to doubt. A young photographer visits his enigmatic great-uncle Jacq, who moved to Paraguay thirty years ago for reasons that have always remained obscured to the family in the Netherlands. His ambitious goal is to “disclose” Jacq’s hermitic life, but the latter isn’t exactly eager to cooperate. Without notice, he sometimes leaves his nephew alone in the house for days on end. The photographer locates his great-uncle in Hohenau by means of a newspaper clipping he finds in a drawer. Its headline reads: “Nazi officials seeking refuge in Latin America”. However, history is far more complicated than the photographer’s hasty puzzling seemed to suggest. ‘Hohenau’ came about through loose associations with the photographs Wytske van Keulen made of a far relative living abroad. Though reality and fiction share some parallels, the outcome is totally different. We
would come to doubt everything. And almost everyone would come to
doubt.Wystke van Keulen en Nickel van Duijvenboden Self-issued, 2008 ISBN 978-90-813733-1-9 Dutch and English 11.5 x 18 cm / 328 p. / hardcover €25 Order here |
‘Wild Viewing Screen’ is a short story written for the
anniversary publication of AKV/St. Joost, an art
academy in the south of Holland. The book is titled
De laatste fotograaf? which translates as ‘The Last
Photographer?’
Starting point for the text was a totalitarian state where an absolute ban on photographic images is enforced. The protagonist is among the last to own a loaded camera. We follow him on an expedition through a restricted zone; his personal and political situation can be deduced from his observations. The title ‘Wild Viewing Screen’ is a literal translation of the Dutch “wildkijkscherm”, an object found in nature reserves throughout The Netherlands. They enable one to observe the wildlife unnoticed. Because their location, build and outlook are so arbitrary, the word “wild viewing screen” could also be interpreted as ‘screen for a wild view’. In the story, the presence of such a screen is both physical and symbolical. De
laatste fotograaf?Flip Bool, Marga Rotteveel, Fw: (ed.) AKV | St.Joost, 2008 ISBN 978-90-76861-15-9 Dutch 16 x 22 cm / 216 p. / paperback €17,50 Order here |
‘Metamorphosis’ is an interior monologue of an ambiguous
character and an analysis of the gaze. Serving a starting point
is a found photo album depicting high-ranking SS officers in the vicinity
of Auschwitz, enjoying their time off. The pictures were taken
in the summer of 1944, when the exterminations were proceeding at peak
level. Among the portrayed is Josef Mengele, the ‘Angel of Death’, who
conducted cruel experiments on inmates. The news of the album’s discovery reminded me of a series of colour slides taken by a German soldier, which I had once digitised as a job for a conservation lab. I had noticed that my task made me look at the images as ‘material’. I worked without delving too deep into the meaning of the images. This attitude is addressed in ‘Metamorphosis’. I imagined a situation where a conservator is faced with slides of Mengele, without asking himself who the depicted person might be. This stance is similar to the gaze of a camera: it perceives only one dimension of Auschwitz ’44 and is oblivious to underlying realities. The images’ significance is doubly overlooked. Mengele is only obliquely dealt with in the text. References to his practice, however, are numerous. The way the conservator handles the slides, thinking of them as mere objects, echoes the manner in which people were subjected to experiments. ‘Metamorphosis’ was written for the lecture series The Past in the Present compiled by Frank van der Stok, and read to an audience in Las Palmas, Rotterdam in October 2007. It was simultaneously published as the second issue of Il faut. In December 2008, it was republished by Fotomuseum Antwerp for their magazine. Il
faut 2: Gedaanteverwisseling / MetamorphosisNickel van Duijvenboden & Gwenneth Boelens Il faut, 2007 Dutch or English 29,7 x 42 cm / 1 p. / photocopy with manually applied adhesive €15 (with numbers 1 and 4) Order here |
‘Ramble’ was written for a spatial installation by visual
artist Gwenneth Boelens. In it the viewer is surrounded by a
botanical scene constructed from black and white photo fragments.
Meanwhile a female voice is heard, pronouncing a monologue about
an “artificial wilderness” in which nothing is left to chance. The work Ramble contains allusions to various human efforts to simulate nature. Both text and images, however, draw attention to situations man could never create, and details that will always give away planning and premeditation. Il
faut 1: RambleNickel van Duijvenboden & Gwenneth Boelens Il faut, 2006 English 18 x 26 cm / 8 p. / stapled €15 (with numbers 2 and 4) Order here |
Howard, realistic painter and cynic borrowed from a
novel by Zadie Smith, is one day lecturing an audience
of art students. He scornfully criticises artists who
conceive their works “flirtatiously”. He believes that
only by “slaving away at it”, the creative process can
result in something significant. Afterwards, when
asked to share some positive thoughts for a change,
he does not know what to say. A few days later he doubtfully regards his own work: explicit paintings of gruesome scenes, like the splattered corpses of “WTC Jumpers” and child rapes. It is beginning to dawn on him that his total lack of positive inspiration only led him into artistic block. From then on, Howard is on an endeavor to find an antidote to his cynical frame of mind. For me, writing ‘Howard’ meant a break with my usual working method. Not only is it fiction, when a typical lecture was to be expected; this story is also a rather optimistic one, in contrast to his earlier writings, which were intermittently skeptical and polemic. To an extent, Howard can be considered an alter ego. The setting of the lecture Howard delivers in the story ironically corresponded to reality. ‘Howard’ was written for Academie Minerva in Groningen, where in October 2006 it was read aloud in addition to a workshop by German photographer Peter Bialobrzeski. During the reading, a selection of images was shown on a television monitor. Download the full text in Documents |
A first sound work, Strings is a soliloquy
about a virtual city based on
the architectural aspects of video games. The text marvels at the
sense of liberty and haphazardness that virtual worlds can evoke
despite their conspicuously constructed nature. Originally a text, Strings was presented as an art object at a gallery. It consists of a silkscreen print in an edition of twelve and an audio CD. Next to a spoken version of the text printed, the CD contains a half hour-long session of a female voice pronouncing personal notes kept during the process of creating this work. Not having been rehearsed, the disordered notes are read in a faltering, hesitant manner, placing emphasis on the process of translation between unrefined ideas and a concise final result. ReeksNickel van Duijvenboden CD with silk screen print, edition of 12 Dutch 14,8 x 21 cm €120,- |
In ‘The Grand Absence’, I imagine a situation where a father
cannot attend the opening of his son’s graduate exhibition.
Instead they discuss over the phone the “objective photographs”
the son put on display. Their animated
dialogue is intermitted with quotes and thoughts
on art, photography and imagination. This essay is my attempt to verbalise the deadlock I experience between written and visual language. The question is: is it really necessary that the father come to see the actual pictures, or might the son as well explain what is there to be seen? At the same time ‘The Grand Absence’ deals with a more personal issue, that of a son lacking acknowledgment from his father. Published along with six other essays, The Grand Absence formed my graduation work. The exam was characterised by the total absence of images. During the evaluation as well as at the opening, I merely recited a passage from the book. I graduated as a photographer without showing any photographs. De grote afwezige; Essays over fotografie, as the publication is called in Dutch, is a self issued edition of 500. Download the full essay ‘The Grand Absence’ in Documents De
grote afwezige: Essays over fotografieNickel van Duijvenboden Self-issued, 2003 Dutch 15,5 x 22,5 cm / 48 p. / paperback €12,50 Order here |
| All texts © Nickel van Duijvenboden, 2003 - 2010 Translations by David McKay (Latecomers, Looking at Thinking, Reservoir, Aleksander), Sarah-Jane Jaeggi (Plateau, Hohenau, Howard), Aarnoud Rommens (Metamorphosis) and Iris Maher (The Grand Absence) |